Home

 

Pinal/Gila Long Term Care—Conflict of Interest and Mishandling of Public Monies (December 2008)

 

 

SUMMARY

In April 2007, the Office of the Auditor General received an anonymous complaint alleging potential financial misconduct by two Pinal/Gila Long Term Care (P/GLTC) employees: Irma Potter, Director of Network Development, and Donna Anderson, former Contracts Coordinator. During our investigation, we determined that Ms. Potter and Ms. Anderson misused their Pinal County employment status and intentionally violated conflict-of-interest laws. As a result, we submitted our report to the Pinal County Attorney’s Office and it has taken criminal action against both employees, which resulted in their indictment on felony charges. See the Conclusion on page 15 of this report.

Our investigation revealed that in December 2005, Ms. Potter and Ms. Anderson violated conflict-of-interest laws by unlawfully accepting a $1,500 ($750 each) cash payment for providing consulting services to a county vendor. Both county employees improperly received a financial benefit from this county vendor, while concurrently being in a position to influence county decisions relating to that vendor’s contract. Even after the payment was made, both employees continued to inappropriately participate in monitoring the contract by negotiating, renewing, and recommending pricing increases to the vendor’s January 2006 contract.

In addition, preceding the conflict-of-interest violation, from July 2005 to January 2006, Ms. Anderson inappropriately and without authority instigated two rate increases to the same county vendor’s contracted rates. As a public official, Ms. Anderson had a responsibility to prudently manage county assets, but because of her inappropriate actions, she mishandled public monies by allowing overpayments to this vendor totaling nearly $34,000.

Finally, the County did not properly oversee the P/GLTC contract administration or the subsequent investigation into these two employees’ misconduct. Specifically, county officials failed to implement an adequate system of internal controls over the P/GLTC program services. County officials also failed to solicit advice from its legal counsel relating to Ms. Potter’s and Ms. Anderson’s misconduct, adequately document its investigation and findings, and review the P/GLTC non-emergency transportation services contract for potential violations.


Read full report in Acrobat PDF format

 

 

 
 

 Home | About UsPublications | Careers | Links | Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Webmaster

Copyright 2013 State of Arizona Office of the Auditor General, All Rights Reserved.